Piggybacking off of that but what has happened in Japan over the past decade or so? I can’t seem to remember when the last update was.Since Persia and DEI doesn't have too much updates, they would be a good start for one.(Especially how Persia developes without Reza Khan/ Indonesia without Japanese would be interesting..)
Updates on reactions of Gandhi Bose and Nehru on Ghadar would be interesting too I guess..
Agreed; it would be interesting to see how Giolitti’s attempt to sideline the Socialists has panned out.Could we see a detailed look at what is going on in Italy around this time. They are a Great Power and a CEW-combatant, and have had the least amount of exploration of their internal politics, economy and military.
In the last update Portugal still retains control of the territories outlined in the “pink map” but they’re also finding it hard to exploit it bc of financial difficulties; I think it’s implied that Britain, France or Germany could take it out from under them.Can someone help me remember if we got a map from Africa? I can't remember if the Scramble happened, what I do remember is that the British are still in Nigeria and the Boers republics survived; if it didn't then this can lead to very interesting geopolitical developments from the African countrie trying to modernize and the industrialized powers wanting their resources.
I agree; ultimately, a union of the 3 islands would be unworkable. Cuba is simply far too large and rich compared to the other two that it would dominate the whole thing, breeding resentment that would only be exacerbated by the physical distances involved. That being said, that doesn't at all mean that Madrid wouldn't try to force such an arrangement anyway, using the same reasoning that you've presented; there's plenty of precedent for that sort of naive thinking (see East Pakistan , or, much more relevantly, the West Indies Federation).My thinking on the Spanish Caribbean is that on the one hand, a union of Cuba, PR and SD would be a legitimate force in Latin America; on the other hand, having exited out from under control of Madrid, Puerto Ricans, for instance, would probably start chafing pretty rapidly at being dominated from Cuba, since Havana would rapidly emerge as the political, cultural and economic heart of such a union. So my instinct would be three separate states that are nonetheless in some kind of mutual commonwealth with a customs and passport union with a central body to coordinate policy and cooperation; weaker than the EU, stronger than the OAS/OTL Commonwealth. We'd probably see something like this emerge in the successor states of Atlantic Canada, too.
We've just passed the OTL point when Venezuela made its first oil discovery; if that has still happened on schedule then that would be worth a check in.With that in mind, I wanted to open the floor to any requests on content for the 1915-17 cycle that I may not have considered in my notes, since I was so focused on getting to May of 1915 that my notes from here on out are (once again - not the first time this has happened!) thin.
I'm still trying to figure out how the (insert appropriate obscenities & profanities here) anyone could hold a legitimate election in Kentucky at this point. (In my head, the Confederacy controls about 8-10% of Kentucky at this point, mostly within 100 miles of the Virginia State Line.)I really would love to see some more about the homefront of the Union and CSA during the war as well as some stuff on the use of propaganda on both sides. This is going to be all the more important in the case of the CSA - because keeping the citizenry united in the face of the Union sinking into the Confederate's exposed belly right now is going to be interesting to say the least. I' also looking forward to the Confederate elections and seeing whatever poor SOB is left holding the bag here (how would the election work in areas occupied by the Union? My gut would say that such areas just won't be voting - but what would happen to Congressional elections in districts totally occuped by the Union? Also, does this help further undermine the legitimacy of the government. On the other hand, I could see the Union actually working to maintain some semblence of normalcy in the occupied territory by allowing the election to still happen - good propaganda after all. Though if Union-occupied districts start strangly producing a flood of pro-peace candidates, Richmond may not be seating said representatives! )
The state legislature could select the electors maybe? In the former thread I mentioned the example of CO, whose legislature did this in OTL's 1876.I'm still trying to figure out how the (insert appropriate obscenities & profanities here) anyone could hold a legitimate election in Kentucky at this point. (In my head, the Confederacy controls about 8-10% of Kentucky at this point, mostly within 100 miles of the Virginia State Line.)
This idea brought up one thing I just realized and I'm not sure if it was clarified.The state legislature could select the electors maybe? In the former thread I mentioned the example of CO, whose legislature did this in OTL's 1876.
Following Gandhi in South Africa is a long term plan of mine that may wind up in the EU threadSince Persia and DEI doesn't have too much updates, they would be a good start for one.(Especially how Persia developes without Reza Khan/ Indonesia without Japanese would be interesting..)
Updates on reactions of Gandhi Bose and Nehru on Ghadar would be interesting too I guess..
Could we see a detailed look at what is going on in Italy around this time. They are a Great Power and a CEW-combatant, and have had the least amount of exploration of their internal politics, economy and military.
I do need more attention to Italy - thankfully, there’s lots of runway up to the CEW to do it!Agreed; it would be interesting to see how Giolitti’s attempt to sideline the Socialists has panned out.
The clusterfuck of the 1915 elections will come up soon, fear not good sirI really would love to see some more about the homefront of the Union and CSA during the war as well as some stuff on the use of propaganda on both sides. This is going to be all the more important in the case of the CSA - because keeping the citizenry united in the face of the Union sinking into the Confederate's exposed belly right now is going to be interesting to say the least. I' also looking forward to the Confederate elections and seeing whatever poor SOB is left holding the bag here (how would the election work in areas occupied by the Union? My gut would say that such areas just won't be voting - but what would happen to Congressional elections in districts totally occuped by the Union? Also, does this help further undermine the legitimacy of the government. On the other hand, I could see the Union actually working to maintain some semblence of normalcy in the occupied territory by allowing the election to still happen - good propaganda after all. Though if Union-occupied districts start strangly producing a flood of pro-peace candidates, Richmond may not be seating said representatives! )
Can someone help me remember if we got a map from Africa? I can't remember if the Scramble happened, what I do remember is that the British are still in Nigeria and the Boers republics survived; if it didn't then this can lead to very interesting geopolitical developments from the African countrie trying to modernize and the industrialized powers wanting their resources.
@Belka DNW heres your answerIn the last update Portugal still retains control of the territories outlined in the “pink map” but they’re also finding it hard to exploit it bc of financial difficulties; I think it’s implied that Britain, France or Germany could take it out from under them.
My plan is to go deeper on Venezuela post-GAW, especially as Franco-German tensions rise… more to comeI agree; ultimately, a union of the 3 islands would be unworkable. Cuba is simply far too large and rich compared to the other two that it would dominate the whole thing, breeding resentment that would only be exacerbated by the physical distances involved. That being said, that doesn't at all mean that Madrid wouldn't try to force such an arrangement anyway, using the same reasoning that you've presented; there's plenty of precedent for that sort of naive thinking (see East Pakistan , or, much more relevantly, the West Indies Federation).
We've just passed the OTL point when Venezuela made its first oil discovery; if that has still happened on schedule then that would be worth a check in.
Another place I think worth checking in on, even if I doubt they'd be too affected by the war, is Hawaii, which has kept its independence IIRC.
Wont quite be a 20-30 seat gain but math for the Drehung will keep getting more and more complicatedOne thing I have been wondering is how the German SPD will do come the 1918 elections. They won 106 seats in the Reichstag TTL in 1913, and 110 seats on 35% of the vote in 1912 OTL. They likely have the same percentage of votes and underperformed relative to total vote percentage versus seats. I could see a gain of 20-30 seats based on how their voting patterns are concentrated.
It’s just ten dudes out in the hollers near Harlan voting at this point lolI'm still trying to figure out how the (insert appropriate obscenities & profanities here) anyone could hold a legitimate election in Kentucky at this point. (In my head, the Confederacy controls about 8-10% of Kentucky at this point, mostly within 100 miles of the Virginia State Line.)
That’s actually not a bad solution (and seems pretty on brand for the CSA frankly)The state legislature could select the electors maybe? In the former thread I mentioned the example of CO, whose legislature did this in OTL's 1876.
Don’t see why they wouldn’t have, especially considering how tight of a leash Tillman had over his home state at one pointThis idea brought up one thing I just realized and I'm not sure if it was clarified.
South Carolina chose its electors in the legislature (no popular vote) right up until 1860. Did they keep doing this post-secession, and if so for how long?
the East Pakistan example!An interesting turn would be Cuba, PR, and Santo Domingo released as a union and then Cuba, which resisted Spain for so long, fights an imperialist war to suppress PR and Santo Domingo to continue their Carribean Union when PR and Santo Domingo try to break free..
And what outcome is that?I love everything about these updates and if I'm feeling your implications correctly than I am wanting the outcome you (maybe) have planned
One question, is there a Kingdom of Cuba in the future of this timeline? O:
I mean if the SPD continues getting the votes it got IOTL and seems to have gotten ITTL as well there's only so long the conservative establishment can ice them out before the dam breaks (obviously not anything resembling Belgium, but there's gonna be an SPD chancellor eventually unless the party self-immolates or something and someone gonna have to get their head out of the sand eventually).Wont quite be a 20-30 seat gain but math for the Drehung will keep getting more and more complicated
South Carolina still elected its electors via legislature in 19-fucking-15.Don’t see why they wouldn’t have, especially considering how tight of a leash Tillman had over his home state at one point
Do you know about the atl Boxer Rebellion from the prologoue or have you read the original thread?I know we've had the Alt!Boxer Rebellion and China is potentially in a worse place now than it is OTL