I would like to offer my two cents worth of observations.
When it comes to Tunisia, come on guys, it is de Lattre we are talking about. There is
no chance the remnants of the DAK to lower themselves to be interned by French of all people, not after they conquered France in the most stunning victory in living memory. Likewise, I believe de Lattre was serious on the doctrine to "fight whoever comes". He won't bent.
@jeandebueil ,
@Starinski what are you guys thinking on the topic?
We have talked about butterflies on Malaya, Rabaul and Timor, but what about Ambon?
@allanpcameron I have here a number of sources on the topic:
Basically, a whole brigade at Ambon is more than Scriven had recommended in OTL. He had ascertained that the island should be defended by two infantry battalions and three troops of howitzers. Instead, Ambon gets 3 infantry battalions and an artillery regiment. Due to the lack of forces, the OTL Australians had few options when it came to their deployment: they could not contest the landings and were positioned further inland.
That won't be the case in TTL. The IJA has 3 infantry battalions, 1 artillery battalion (12 75mm guns) and 579 men of the Kure 1st SNLF. The Allies have an australian brigade group and the 2,600 Dutch garrison of regular KNIL men and militia. The Australians had already guessed correctly where landings would take place and in TTL they will be able to have dug in troops there. I cannot see the first assault succeeding. Granted, Ambon will fail, but the Japanese would need to prepare a second assault.
A prolonged defence of Ambon buys a lot of time to the defenders of Timor, since the Ambon IJA force was the backbone of the Timor invasion. Postpone a landing at Timor and then the Allies will have a whole division at the island.