redlightning
Banned
What if OJ Simpson had been convicted of the 1994 murders? How is he different than OTL and is culture as a whole?
that doesn't jive with what the media was saying at the time, which was that it seemed to be a murder carried out by someone really angry, a 'crime of passion'...Plus, the way that they were killed suggests that professionals were probably responsible, not O.J.
Seeing parts of the recent documentary on OJ, it does not appear like a professional hit at all. There was definitely drug involvement amongst Goldman's friends, but even many of OJ's friends became convinced he did it. Most African American's who may have cheered his acquittal will still not say he was innocent. The LA Race relations after the Rodney King incident, trials and riots really were very difficult then...and seem to be headed that way again unfortunately.
The whole OJ thing broke my heart as I was a kid who came to love football in the mid 70's. OJ was simply awesome as a running back and I doubt we have seen anyone like him since. He was handsome to all and very well spoken. Of course, he had been violent with Nicole and his first wife Marguerite but it did not come to many folks attention until Nicole's death. He had been protected for quite a while.
sure. Did anything in the evidence really point to it being a professional hit? Anything specific, any motives for it?"that doesn't jive with what the media was saying at the time, which was that it seemed to be a murder carried out by someone really angry, a 'crime of passion'..."
The media prints or broadcasts everything the prosecutors tell them to.
I don't know if I would rely on Youtube comments as a reliable source for info about a trial...I did watch some of part four (of OJ in America) this morning, and I have also been watching First Take's review of the episodes on You Tube (Skip Bayless and Stephen A. Smith). In the comments section, there are people talking about how Nicole was a drug whore (allegedly, O.J. caught her having sex with some other man upstairs at their home while the kids were downstairs. Someone made a point that he could have killed her then if he was so obsessed), and about how she wrote Simpson a letter begging him to take her back. If that's true, those facts (and other things they shared) cast doubt on him being guilty.
Also, would any OJ conviction butterfly any future fame for the Kardashians as their father, Robert Senior, was one of OJ's lawyers?
I did watch some of part four (of OJ in America) this morning, and I have also been watching First Take's review of the episodes on You Tube (Skip Bayless and Stephen A. Smith). In the comments section, there are people talking about how Nicole was a drug whore (allegedly, O.J. caught her having sex with some other man upstairs at their home while the kids were downstairs. Someone made a point that he could have killed her then if he was so obsessed), and about how she wrote Simpson a letter begging him to take her back. If that's true, those facts (and other things they shared) cast doubt on him being guilty.
Pro tip: "people talking in the comments section of YouTube" is not the same as "reliable source".
Actually, the two are inversely related.
Yeah, a fair amount of the time, but there are a lot of places on the internet like that. No reason to single out You Tube. And, they may make some good points. You can't just believe everything that the media tells you (which is what those YT commenters criticized other people for doing).