Yes, but not as absolute as one could think (read still pretty absolute)
Hopefully it's a short-lived one.
Yes, but not as absolute as one could think (read still pretty absolute)
Hopefully it's a short-lived one.
nope its LONG
if you get my drift
console yourself with the fact that the Socialist Party will become far more prominent later on
Yeah, I think it all seems pretty believable so far although I'm rather suspicious of party collapses but that's fine. Keep going. Always love the Kingfish!is the plausibility good so far?
Yeah, I think it all seems pretty believable so far although I'm rather suspicious of party collapses but that's fine. Keep going. Always love the Kingfish!
is the plausibility good so far?
Hi there! This is a pretty interesting TL, btw.....especially because the Kingfish is a little underappreciated, IMHO.
Mostly, yeah, except that you should *really* rename the Coughlin Bill if you don't want significant plausibility issues: IOTL, as it was, the guy had very little of his former popularity remaining by the end of the 1930s, something that isn't liable to change much, even with the absence of FDR(also, Coughlin was not in government, something that's also rather unlikely to change).
Why not try somebody like Jeannette Rankin, instead? Although a woman, she was still fairly respected amongst Montanans, and it shouldn't be too difficult to get her back in office a little earlier. But, if you feel that's a little too risky, William E. Borah would also work out pretty good as well, as he was a progressive as well(and his being Secretary of State shouldn't be much of a problem.).